Double.equals метод

e•qual

(ˈi kwəl) adj., n., v. e•qualed, e•qual•ingesp. Brit.e•qualled, e•qual•ling.adj. 1. as great as; the same as (often fol. by to or with).
2. like or alike in quantity, degree, value, etc.
3. of the same rank, ability, merit, etc.:
4. evenly proportioned or balanced:
5. uniform in operation or effect:
6. adequate or sufficient in quantity or degree.
7. having adequate ability or means; suited:
8. level, as a plain.
9. tranquil or undisturbed.
10. impartial or equitable.
n. 11. a person or thing that is equal.
v.t. 12. to be or become equal to; meet or match, as in value.
13. to make or do something equal to:
14. Archaic. to make equal; equalize.
15. Obs. to recompense fully.
[1350–1400; < Latin aequālis equal, like]
usage: See unique.

e·qual

(ē′kwəl)
adj.
1. Having the same quantity, measure, or value as another.

2. Mathematics Being the same or identical to in value.

3.
a. Having the same privileges, status, or rights:

b. Being the same for all members of a group:

4.
a. Having the requisite qualities, such as strength or ability, for a task or situation:

b. Similar to or the same as another, as in ability:

n. One that is equal to another:

tr.v. e·qualed, e·qual·ing, e·quals or e·qualled or e·qual·ling
1. To be equal to, especially in value.

2. To do, make, or produce something equal to:

[Middle English, from Latin aequālis, from aequus, even, level.]

e′qual·ly adv.

Usage Note: It has been argued that equal is an absolute term—two quantities either are or are not equal—and hence cannot be qualified as to degree. Therefore one cannot logically speak of a more equal allocation of resources among the departments. But this usage is fairly common, and was acceptable to 71 percent of the Usage Panel as far back as 1967. Objections to the more equal construction assume that the mathematical notion of equality is appropriate to the description of a world where the equality of two quantities is often an approximate matter, and where statements of equality are always relative to an implicit standard of tolerance. In The two boards are of equal length, we assume that the equality is reckoned to some order of approximation determined by the context; if we did not, we would be required always to use nearly equal when speaking of the dimensions of physical objects. What is more, we often speak of the equality of things that cannot be measured quantitatively, as in The college draft was introduced in an effort to make the teams in the National Football League as equal as possible, or The candidates for the job should all be given equal consideration. In such cases, equality is naturally a gradient notion and can be modified in degree. This much is evident from the existence of the word unequal, for the prefix un- attaches only to gradient adjectives. We say unmanly but not unmale; and the word uneven can be applied to a surface (whose evenness may be a matter of degree) but not to a number (whose evenness is an either/or affair). · The adverb equally is often regarded as redundant when used in combination with as, as in Experience is equally as valuable as theory or Aptitude is essential; but equally as important is the desire to learn. In our 2015 ballot, the example sentences above were deemed unacceptable by 64 percent and 53 percent of the Usage Panel respectively. Even among those Panelists who rated the sentences as acceptable, there were several who commented that it would be preferable to avoid the redundancy for stylistic reasons. Fortunately, one can easily streamline sentences such as these, as by deleting equally from the first example and as from the second. See Usage Notes at absolute, as1, center, perfect, unique.